mobile-first-indexing

Google Announces Mobile First Indexing For The Whole Web

Gary Illyes, Google webmaster trends analyst, during a SMX Advanced conference in Seattle in June 2017 had mentioned that the Mobile-First index is going to be huge.

Illyes had said:

“We don’t have a timeline for the launch yet but, we have some ideas for when this will launch, but it’s probably many quarters away. Our engineers’ timeline was initially end of 2017. Right now, we think more 2018.

Our blog Post: https://www.webpro.in/google-rolls-out-mobile-first-indexing-some-important-faqs-answered/  published in April 2018 , answers the following FAQs about Mobile First Indexing.

  1. What Does Mobile First Indexing Mean?
  2. How does Google evaluate sites for Mobile First Indexing?
  3. What are the best practices for Mobile First Indexing?
  4. Does Mobile First Indexing affect rankings?
  5. How does the page load time affect mobile-first indexing?
  6. How does Google notify webmasters/site owners that their websites have been migrated to mobile-first index?

Yesterday, Google has announced Mobile First Indexing for the whole web. Google published on their webmaster’s blog:

From our analysis, most sites shown in search results are good to go for mobile-first indexing. 70% of those shown in our search results have already shifted over. To simplify, we'll be switching to mobile-first indexing for all websites starting September 2020. In the meantime, we'll continue moving sites to mobile-first indexing when our systems recognize that they're ready.

Google points the following regarding Mobile First Indexing:

  1. When Google switches a domain to mobile-first indexing, it will see an increase in Googlebot's crawling, while Google updates its index to the site's mobile version.
  2. In Search Console, there are multiple ways to check for mobile-first indexing. The status is shown on the settings page, as well as in the URL Inspection Tool, when checking a specific URL with regards to its most recent crawling.
  3. Google recommends making sure that the content shown for the mobile version and the desktop version is the same (including text, imagesvideos, links). The  meta data (titles and descriptions, robots meta tags) and all structured data too should be the same.
  4. In the URL Testing Tools you can easily check both desktop and mobile versions directly.
  5. While Google continues to support various ways of making mobile websites, Google recommends responsive web design for new websites.
  6. Google suggests not using separate mobile URLs (often called "m-dot") because of issues and confusion Google has seen over the years, both from search engines and users.
Review-Test-Tool

Google Search Console Adds New Reports For Review Snippets

 

Recently Google had announced that:

Google uses structured data standardized formats and shared schemas to provide information about a page and the things described by the page. This information is used for two main purposes:

  1. Understand the content of the page
  2. Enable special search result features and enhancements

Yesterday Google has announced:

We support  review snippets in Google Search Console, and include new reports to help you find any issues with your implementation and monitor how this rich result type is improving your performance. You can also use the Rich Results Test to review your existing URLs or debug your markup code before moving it to production.

This is a clear indication that Google is giving more and more importance to Structured Data for various aspects.

Here Google clearly states that :

To help site owners make the most of their reviews, a new review snippet report is now available in Search Console for sites that have implemented reviews or ratings structured data. The report allows you to see errors, warnings, and valid pages for markup implemented on your site.

The Performance report shows the Review Snippet Results

The Search Console Performance report now allows you to see the performance of your review or rating marked-up pages on Google Search and Discover using the new “Review snippet” search appearance filter.

review-snippet1

This helps you filter your data to see which queries, pages, countries and devices are bringing your review snippets traffic.

Review snippet in Rich Results Test

Review-Test-Tool

 

After adding Review snippets structured data to your pages, you can test them using the Rich Results Test tool. You can test a code snippet or submit a URL of a page.

 

 

 

SEO-Training-Ahmedabad-Management-Association

Understanding Structured Data (SD) and John Mueller’s View About SD Usage And Ranking Boost

What is structured data?

Structured data is highly-organized and formatted in a way so it's easily searchable in relational databases. We have to remember that  not all data is created equal hence not all data is organized equally. This means the data generated from social media apps are completely different from the data generated by point-of-sales or supply chain systems.

Examples of structured data include names, dates, addresses, credit card numbers, stock information, geolocation, and more.

The most attractive feature of structured data is that one can easily input, search and update data and also correlate it more efficiently.

Google works  hard to understand the content of a page. Clues on the page surely help Google in correlating content better. Since, structured data is a standardized and organized format for providing information about a page and understanding the page content; for example, on a product page, what is the name of the product, the price, availability, color, the image, description and so on.

Structured data schemas such as schema.org and data-vocabulary.org are used to define shared meaningful structures for markup-based applications on the Web. But, Google announced recently as schema.org is more popular and is widely being used so they will focus only on one SD scheme that is schema.org. From April 6, 2020 onwards, data-vocabulary.org markup will no longer be eligible for Google rich result features.

Is structured data a direct ranking factor?

Google Structured Data Guidelines clearly mentions the following:

Important:

Google does not guarantee that your structured data will show up in search results, even if your page is marked up correctly according to the Structured Data Testing Tool.

More so,

John Mueller of Google said on Twitter recently that although structured data, by itself, does not give you a ranking boost, it can help Google understand your content and thus help you rank in Google.

He added, in 2015 Google did say they may use structured data for ranking purposes. But just last year, Google said they don't want to depend on structured data for understanding the web, although they also said structured data is super important and here to stay.

 

SEO-Training-Ahmedabad-Management-Association

As of April 6, 2020, data-vocabulary.org markup will no longer be eligible for Google rich result features

Structured data is a standardized format for providing information about a page and classifying the page content; for example, on a recipe page, what are the ingredients, the cooking time and temperature, the calories, and so on.

The use of structured data helps Google :

  1. To Understand the content of the page
  2. To Enable special search result features and enhancements

Structured data schemas such as schema.org and data-vocabulary.org are used to define shared meaningful structures for markup-based applications on the Web.

Google announced today as schema.org is more popular and is widely being used so they will focus only on one SD scheme that is schema.org.

From April 6, 2020 onwards, data-vocabulary.org markup will no longer be eligible for Google rich result features.

Starting today Google will warn the developers via search console regarding the pages using the data-vocabulary.org. This will help the developers to make the necessary amends on the pages to remain eligible for Google rich result features.

Google Search supports structured data in the following formats, unless documented otherwise:

Format Description and Placement
JSON-LD* (Recommended) JavaScript notation embedded in a <script> tag in the page head or body. The markup is not interleaved with the user-visible text, which makes nested data items easier to express, such as the Country of a PostalAddress of a MusicVenue of an Event. Also, Google can read JSON-LD data when it is dynamically injected into the page's contents, such as by JavaScript code or embedded widgets in your content management system.
Microdata An open-community HTML specification used to nest structured data within HTML content. Like RDFa, it uses HTML tag attributes to name the properties you want to expose as structured data. It is typically used in the page body, but can be used in the head.
RDFa An HTML5 extension that supports linked data by introducing HTML tag attributes that correspond to the user-visible content that you want to describe for search engines. RDFa is commonly used in both the head and body sections of the HTML page.

Google recommends using JSON-LD for structured data whenever possible.

Microdata is a component of HTML5 aimed at adding more semantics and contextual information to existing content on a page. By doing so, Microdata provides the search engines or browsers, with more information about the content of a page.

Microdata is an attempt to provide a simpler way of annotating HTML elements with machine readable tags than the similar approaches of using RDFa and Microformats.

Microdata vocabularies provide the semantics, or meaning of an Item. Web developers can design a custom vocabulary or use vocabularies available on the web.

A collection of commonly used (and Google Supported) Microdata vocabularies located at http://data-vocabulary.org which include: Person, Event,Organization, Product, Review, Review-aggregate, Breadcrumb, Offer, Offer-aggregate.   Major search engines rely on this markup to improve search results. Content expressed as microdata on the web page gets correlated easily to the data vocabulary it is giving information about making it easy for the search engine find relevance and connectivity.

Google clearly mentions in its blog that in order to be eligible for Google rich result features we recommend converting your data-vocabulary.org structured data to schema.org.

For example, here is how you would change the data vocabulary to schema.org
Data-vocabulary.org

data vocabulary markup

Schema.org

 

Schema Markup

In order to be sure that you are using the correct structured data format on the page you can test the page as follows:

understanding-BERT

Understanding BERT and What We Need To Do To Optimize For BERT

What Is BERT?

Since the inception of Google, Google has been always trying to make search better for the user in terms of the quality of search results and the display of the search results on the search results Page (The SERPS).

The quality of search results can only be better if the search query is understood correctly by the search engine. Many times the user also finds it difficult to formulate a search query to exactly meet his requirement. The user might spell it differently or may not know the right words to use for search. This makes it more difficult for the search engine to display relevant results.

Google Says,

“At its core, Search is about understanding language. It’s our job to figure out what you’re searching for and surface helpful information from the web, no matter how you spell or combine the words in your query. While we’ve continued to improve our language understanding capabilities over the years, we sometimes still don’t quite get it right, particularly with complex or conversational queries. In fact, that’s one of the reasons why people often use “keyword-ese,” typing strings of words that they think we’ll understand, but aren’t actually how they’d naturally ask a question.”

In 2018, Google  opensourced a new technique for natural language processing (NLP)  pre-training called Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers, or BERT. With this release, anyone in the world can train their own state-of-the-art question answering system (or a variety of other models).

This enables the understanding of the relation and context of the words i.e tries to understand the meaning of the words in the search query rather than do word to word mapping before displaying the search results.

This not only requires the advancement in the software but also the hardware used has to be much advanced. So, for the first time Google is  using the latest Cloud TPUs to serve search results and get you more relevant information quickly.

By implementing BERT Google will be able to understand better 1 in 10 searches in US in English. Google intends to bring this to more languages in future. The main goal behind this is to understand the correlation of the prepositions like ‘to’ and other such words in the search query and establish a correct context to display relevant search results.

Before launching and implementing BERT for search on a wide scale and for many languages Google is testing and trying to understand the intent behind the search query fired by the user.

Google has shared some examples as below:

Here’s a search for “2019 brazil traveler to usa need a visa.” The word “to” and its relationship to the other words in the query are particularly important to understanding the meaning. It’s about a Brazilian traveling to the U.S., and not the other way around. Previously, our algorithms wouldn't understand the importance of this connection, and we returned results about U.S. citizens traveling to Brazil. With BERT, Search is able to grasp this nuance and know that the very common word “to” actually matters a lot here, and we can provide a much more relevant result for this query.

BERT Results Example

Let’s look at another query: “do estheticians stand a lot at work.” Previously, our systems were taking an approach of matching keywords, matching the term “stand-alone” in the result with the word “stand” in the query. But that isn’t the right use of the word “stand” in context. Our BERT models, on the other hand, understand that “stand” is related to the concept of the physical demands of a job, and displays a more useful response.

BERT Google Testing Query Example

Some more examples about the nuances of the language which usually are not correlated correctly by the search engines for relevant search results.

 

BERT And SEO

BERT and Search Results in Google

The above examples of before and after the implementation of BERT clearly show the improvement in the search results. This is also being applied to featured snippets.

BERT and SEO - Do we need to optimize for BERT?

After reading this, I am sure the SEOs have the most logical question – How Do We Optimize for BERT ?

The plain and simple answer is – We do not have to optimize differently for BERT. We just need to add more informative relevant content to get a more targeted and extensive search presence.

Look what the SEO experts have to say:

 


In a recent hangout John Mueller added to what Danny had tweeted regarding BERT. (Read Tweet embedded above)

Here was the question posed to John Mueller:

Will you tell me about the Google BERT Update? Which types of work can I do on SEO according to the BERT algorithms?

John Muller’s explanation on the purpose of the BERT algorithm:

I would primarily recommend taking a look at the blog post that we did around this particular change. In particular, what we’re trying to do with these changes is to better understand text. Which on the one hand means better understanding the questions or the queries that people send us. And on the other hand better understanding the text on a page. The queries are not really something that you can influence that much as an SEO.

The text on the page is something that you can influence. Our recommendation there is essentially to write naturally. So it seems kind of obvious but a lot of these algorithms try to understand natural text and they try to better understand like what topics is this page about. What special attributes do we need to watch out for and that would allow use to better match the query that someone is asking us with your specific page. So, if anything, there’s anything that you can do to kind of optimize for BERT, it’s essentially to make sure that your pages have natural text on them…

“..and that they’re not written in a way that…”

“Kind of like a normal human would be able to understand.  So instead of stuffing keywords as much as possible, kind of write naturally.”

We as website owners and SEOs have to understand that Google constantly keeps on working to make search and the search experience better for its users. BERT is one such exercise in that direction.

It is not an algorithmic update directly affecting any of the on-page , off-page or technical factors. BERT is simply aiming to understand and corelate the search query more accurately.

According to Google : Language understanding remains an ongoing challenge and no matter how hard they work in understanding the search queries better, they are always bombarded with surprises with time to time and this makes them go out of their comfort zone again.

As BERT tries to understand search queries better and thereby tries to give more relevant results, the SEO factors do not get directly influenced by its implementation. The only thing that has to be considered is the quality content which has to be regularly added to the site to keep it relevant and corelate to more and more search queries.

January202-core-update

Google Confirms - The January 2020 Core Update Is Live

Yesterday, Google confirmed that there was a core update which had gone live. They called it the January 2020 core update.

@searchliaison is a Twitter handle of Official tweets from Google's public liaison of search.

@dannysullivan currently shares insights on how Google search works on this Twitter account.

 

Barry Shwartz also posted that the core update is live but its big. He also added on the SEO Round Table post that: “Again, it is less than 24-hours, so it is early and things need to settle down over the next few days with this update”

Google also shared a link to one of its previous posts which explains the nitty gritty of core updates.

 

18-09-2019

Google Updates its Rules for Review Rich Search Results

18-09-2019 Google posted on the webmaster blog today that  they have updated the review rich  rules for how and when it shows the reviews rich results. Search results that are enhanced by review rich results can be extremely helpful when searching for products or services (the scores and/or “stars” you sometimes see alongside search results). Google said that to make the review rich results more helpful and meaningful, they are now introducing algorithmic updates to reviews in rich results. review rich search results The main takeaway from this is that if the functionality of posting the reviews on the site is such that they can be moderated or updated then they will not be shown. This applies to even the reviews posted via the third party widgets.

With this change, Google has also  limited the pool of schema types that can potentially trigger review rich results in search. Specifically, they will only display reviews with those types (and their respective subtypes):

According to Google:

Reviews that can be perceived as “self-serving” aren't in the best interest of users. We call reviews “self-serving” when a review about entity A is placed on the website of entity A - either directly in their markup or via an embedded 3rd party widget. That’s why, with this change, we’re not going to display review rich results anymore for the schema types LocalBusiness and Organization (and their subtypes) in cases when the entity being reviewed controls the reviews themselves.

The Leasing or Renting of Subdomains and What Google Has To Say about it.

18-09-20019-1

The logic behind leasing or renting subdomains/subfolders to third parties:

A subdomain is basically a child domain under a larger parent domain name. For example: webpro.in is the parent domain but webshop.webpro.in is the subdomain of webpro.in.

The subdomains are mostly used by people if they have a lot of content about a certain service or product and would like to give more importance to it. This can be done via a sub folder also. A subfolder is a ‘child directory’ (a folder beneath another folder) that lives under a parent (Home) directory, as is a Subdomain.

Subdomains and subfolders are similar in a lot of ways. They’re both file locations inside of a server’s ‘Home’ directory structure and the Home directory.  We refer to them differently in the URL.

For example: webshop.webpro.in is a subdomain but webpro.in/webshop is a subfolder.

If the parent domain has a good search presence and a good domain authority then the subdomain/subfolder can  get some SEO benefit from it. Here I don’t mean the domain authority metric as used by Open Site Explorer but, the actual popularity and the search presence the domain has achieved over a period of time by earning the online trust. This may be because of the age of the domain, quality content on the domain, quality inbound links, good social media presence and mentions across the web on various social media sites, etc.

In short if the domain has earned a good reputation online then, the subdomains and subfolders also get the benefit of that reputation and authority. This helps the subdomain/subfolder get a good search presence faster as compared to any other new domain.

Due to this many people started renting or leasing  the subdomains to third parties. This definitely helps them to make some additional income but can be very misleading for the users. Mainly because, the company using the subdomain may not be as genuine or trustworthy as the parent domain company.

Google has warned publishers about leasing out portion of their sites so that third-parties can benefit from the site's authority and trust and rank their content better. Google has started  penalizing some of those sections on the web sites that are leased out in late August.

This is what Google has to say about the renting or leasing of subdomains:

 

 

 

 

Hence, Google is overall against such practices, unless its activities are closely observed or monitored by the primary domain owners. It clearly says if you want the best success with Search, provide value-added content from your own efforts that reflect your own brand. Google has started penalizing subdomains/subfolders following this practice.

 

Here is a tweet from Glenn Gabe showing how CNN's efforts to lease out subdomains has got affected for some coupon partners now:

 

 

Replying to Glen Gabe Keith Fraley also shared his observation regarding coupons.businessinsider.com

 

Frankly speaking, this was new to me. I was not aware of people leasing subdomain or subfolders. Are you aware of any such domain following this practice?

 

18-09-20019-2

The Nofollow, UGC and Sponsored Link Attributes - 20 Points To Ponder On

 

  1. Nearly 15 years ago, the nofollow attribute was introduced as a means to help fight comment spam. It also quickly became one of Google’s recommended methods for flagging advertising-related or sponsored links.
  2. From 10th September 2019 onwards, three new link attributes, 'sponsored', 'ugc' and 'nofollow', are applicable as hints for Google to incorporate for ranking purposes.
  3. For crawling and indexing purposes, nofollow will become a hint as of March 1, 2020.
  4. No Follow meta tag applies to all the links on the page.
  5. Rel-nofollow is applicable only to the link mentioned in the tag.
  6. No follow meta tag was a directive till Google announced the ‘rel’ link for 'nofollow'.
  7. From now on, the 'no follow' meta tag ceases to be a directive but is considered a hint just like the rel attribute .
  8. All the link attributes -- sponsored, ugc and nofollow -- are treated as hints rather than directives. A directive is a direct specification on which the mentioned action has to be taken by the bots. Hence, earlier when the page had a nofollow meta tag in the header the bot completely ignored the links on that page. A hint means that Google may or may not obey the Meta Robots Nofollow when it encounters it.
  9. There’s absolutely no need to change any nofollow links that you already have.
  10. The nofollow tag is still valid.
  11. But,there is no meta tag for rel-ugc and rel-sponsored.
  12. It is valid to use more than one rel value for a link. For example, rel="ugc sponsored" is a perfectly valid attribute which hints that the link came from user-generated content and is sponsored.
  13. You need not worry if you have used the attributes incorrectly.
  14. Google says, “There’s no wrong attribute except in the case of sponsored links.
  15. If you flag a UGC link or a non-ad link as “sponsored,” we’ll see that hint but the impact -- if any at all -- would be at most that we might not count the link as a credit for another page.”
  16. For WordPress, Joost de Valk (creator of Yoast SEO Plugin) has said that it’s one line of code (for blog comments) and will be added to the next release.If any SEO informs you that Google has announced something new and there will
  17. be many changes required site wide, then he/she is lying. Do not pay heed to it. They are just trying to cheat you.
  18. There is a new New Chrome extension that highlights links using rel=”nofollow”, rel="sponsored" and rel="ugc". The extension is called “Strike Out Nofollow Links”. The extension strikes out links containing relations rel="nofollow", rel="ugc" and/or rel="sponsored". No JavaScript is used, only CSS3 selectors.
  19. Using the new attributes allows Google to better process links for analysis of the web.
  20. As SEOs/developers this can be a small contribution to make things more organized for search engines.

meta-tag-nofollow

Why Robots Nofollow Meta Tag Is a Hint Now, Like rel-nofollow ?

Google Says:

The robots meta tag lets you utilize a granular, page-specific approach to controlling how an individual page should be indexed and served to users in search results. The directives specified using the robots meta tag are used by Google for crawling and indexing the pages and the links on that particular page.

Several other directives can be used to control indexing and crawling. Each value represents a specific directive. The following table shows all the directives that Google honors and their meaning.

Google Directives

The nofollow meta tag <meta name="robots" content="nofollow"> clearly specifies that the if the header of the page has this tag then, Googlebot should not follow the links on the page.

But, the recent announcement by Google introducing the sponsored, nofollow and ugc attributes to be used as rel value in links and has changed the meta tag nofollow from a directive to a hint.

This was clearly stated by Gary Illyes in his tweet :

What is the difference between a directive and a hint?

A directive is a direct specification on which the mentioned action has to be taken by the bots. Hence, earlier when the page had a nofollow meta tag in the header the bot completely ignored the links on that page. A hint means that Google may or may not obey the Meta Robots Nofollow when it encounters it.

The reason for this is given by John Mueller as a part of the Twitter conversation is as follows:

Google directive and hint

The meta tags are specified at the page level and the rel values are specified for each link. The logic behind the nofollow meta tag becoming a hint rather than a directive is that using <meta name="robots" content="nofollow">  is like using a rel-nofollow to all the links on the page from now on.

One thing that we need to be very clear about is that there are no meta tags for ugc and sponsored. Adding that will just pollute the code with unwanted lines of code.

editorial-policy-WebPro-Technologies-LLP-Ahmedabad

Editorial Policy: Human Expertise, Enhanced by AI

At WebPro Technologies, our content reflects over two decades of experience in SEO and digital strategy. We believe that valuable content is built on accuracy, clarity, and insight—and that requires human judgment at every step.

From 2024 onwards, we have been using AI tools selectively to brainstorm ideas, explore perspectives, and refine language, but AI is never the final author. Every article is researched, fact-checked, and edited by our team, ensuring relevance, accuracy, and originality. AI supports our workflow, but the responsibility for quality and credibility remains entirely human.

This hybrid approach allows us to combine the efficiency of technology with the depth of human expertise, so our readers get content that is both informative and trustworthy.

At WebPro, we see AI not as a replacement for human creativity, but as a tool that helps us raise the standard of excellence in the content we share.

SEO Ahmedabad

Contact Info

802, Astron Tech Park, Satellite Road, Opp. Gulmohar Park Mall, Ahmedabad 380015, India

+91 9825025904
info@webpro.in

Daily: 9:00 am - 6:00 pm
Sunday: Closed

Copyright 2025 WebPro Technologies LLP ©  All Rights Reserved